A “Level”
Playing Field
The NBA, NFL and
NHL have bluffed and bullied and b.s.’d their way to a hard salary cap while
MLB maintains a soft one in the form of a luxury tax. The Republican Party may love a flat tax, but
baseball owners have had no problem embracing a steeply progressive tax on
payrolls. Go figure.
The main
argument for a cap is that it maintains competitive balance—how else to keep
franchises afloat in places like Columbus and Green Bay? Nothing could be worse for fans—and it’s
always about the fans, right?—than a Yankees’-like dynasty. Hmm.
Since 2010, the
Giants have won the World Series three times along with four other teams. During that same timeframe in the NHL, the
Black Hawks have won three Stanley Cups to two for the Penguins and Kings. In the NBA, the Heat and Warriors have won
two apiece in finals that have featured Miami four times with Cleveland and
Golden State three times (the last three finals, against one another, no
less). It only seems like the Patriots
win every Super Bowl.
What’s my
point? That contrived brakes on spending
in pro sports don’t work as promised.
What nobody talks about in baseball is the punishment meted out to teams
that spend wildly. When was the last
time those salary-busting Yankees won a World Series? Why, it was in 2000, or 17 long seasons
ago. As for the Giants, they have the
second-worst record in baseball (after the ever-rebuilding Phillies, which is a
story for another day). Who wants to
take on Hunter Pence’s contract? Or Jeff
Samardzija’s?
So, the Warriors
went out and got Kevin Durant at the end of last season, and he helped them win
their second title in three years. So
much for competitive balance. Also keep
in mind everything else a salary cap involves.
Besides Durant, the Warriors’ front office identified talent, acquired
it and then grossly underpaid it (thank you, NBA collective bargaining
agreement). In the end, it’s not how
much you spend but how smart you are spending it.
No comments:
Post a Comment