Copycat
The Seahawks
Richard Sherman told Jalen Rose in an ESPN interview the other day NFL players
have to be willing to strike if they want to improve their status vis a vis the
other sports. “You’re going to have to
miss games, you’re going to have to lose some money, if you’re willing to make
the point [about bigger contracts], because that’s how MLB and NBA got it
done. They missed games, they struck,
they flexed every bit of power they had, and it was awesome. It worked for them.” In the case of baseball, yes, definitely for
the players but not so much the fans.
In several
respects, the NFL is more like the NBA than MLB, so Sherman’s call to arms may
not alienate fans as much as it has in baseball. By that I mean basketball and football fans
go in accepting players as different beings given their size and shape. Baseball, and even more so hockey, still have
players who don’t stand out in their street clothes. Kyle Long and LeBron James will always draw a
crowd wherever they go, not so much Mookie Betts and Tommy La Stella or even
Patrick Kane. Someone like James or Michael
Jordan has demigod status, which includes the right to untold riches. It’s different with a guy who looks like me—or
how I used to look in my 20s—making $10-million plus can rub people the wrong
way, especially if he starts criticizing fans for getting on his performance.
I don’t begrudge
Sherman or any NFL player for wanting to make more money. Football is a brutal game that can shorten
lives in a way baseball doesn’t. But in
the short run, a strike will irritate fans the way work stoppages did in
baseball. After that, who knows? Owners being owners, they’ll no doubt try to
replace any revenue lost to players by recouping it on tickets. I wonder how fans will react.
No comments:
Post a Comment