My God, the proverbial
tree in the forest toppled over, and not a person heard. In other words, women’s pro softball all but
imploded earlier this week when National Pro Fastpitch tossed out the
Houston-based Scrap Yard Dawgs, the 2017 league champion, for purported rule
infractions. That’s the equivalent of
MLB bouncing the World-Series champion Astros.
Clare told me about it
on Monday. Go to the NPF website, and
they basically say the Scrap Yard Dawgs were forced out; go to the SYD site,
and they make it clear they jumped. But
wait, there’s ever so much more. Starting
this year, three of the NPF’s five teams will exist in large part to train
other countries’ athletes.
According to an online
story at espnW, three teams basically will be comprised of either Chinese or
Australian players; the Chicago Bandits are one of the two franchises where
American college graduates will have even the faintest chance of continuing to
play. I can’t wait for President Trump
to hear about this.
Playing in the U.S. to
hone their skills will be very good for the Australians and Chinese, assuming
the NPF season goes forward. (The SYD
sound as if they’re going to become an international barnstorming team. Good luck with that.) What’s wrong with this sport? A comment in the espnW story offers a clue.
Joey Arrietta, former
minority owner and general manager of the Akron Racers, noted that, “Our game
is wildly successful at the collegiate level.
It just blows my mind that there is not that transfer of collegiate
interest [to the NPF].” Indeed. Last year, something like 32,000 female
athletes played college softball in the U.S., on top of 374,000 in high
school. That would seem to be a nice
foundation to build on. Or not.
For openers, Clare
thinks the game is pitched to middle-school fans rather than adults like her;
from the Bandits’ games I’ve attended, she may be right. All the between-innings’ promotions and
gimmicks may be fun for eighth graders, but they leave a decidedly minor-league
feel to anyone interested in a serious game of softball. (The same hold for minor-league baseball, the
romance of which escapes me.) The whole
approach to the game needs to change.
Only, it may be too
late for that. In fifteen years, the
league has never had more than seven teams.
Seven in a country of 300 million people, half of them female? “At the end of the day, corporate America has
to wake up to this women’s sports’ platform,” argues Arrieta. What if it has?
What if corporate America
has seen the future, and it doesn’t include professional women’s softball? So far in American sports, women’s national
teams—including basketball, ice hockey, soccer and softball—attract strong
interest and the financial support that comes with it. But try and extend that interest to pro
leagues, and it pretty much disappears.
The WNBA is a poor relation of the NBA, and the other women’s sports are
virtual orphans.
What do women sports’ fans
want? I don’t pretend to know, though
for softball I have some ideas of my own.
The NPF has to model itself after major league baseball, with plenty of
teams to insure geographic balance and a schedule of at least 100 games, if not
more. If equality between the sexes means
women showing they can accomplish what men do, the closer to 162 games the
better.
Softball also needs its
landmarks in the way of Wrigley Field and Fenway Park, places that will give
the sport a sense of tradition and permanence.
This is an architectural problem that goes back to my basic problem with
softball—the dimensions are too short for players so good, especially pitchers.
In professional
baseball, the stands follow the contours of the field. The same is true in softball, with far
different results because softball doesn’t have dead centerfields of 400 feet
(or 300, for that matter). Ballparks in
baseball have seating for anywhere from 5,000 to 50,000 fans. That translates into upper decks and heft, if
you will. The Chicago Bandits play in a
stadium that seats all of 2,000. We can
get almost that many people into our basement, which doesn’t turn our bungalow
into a mansion. The solution?
Well, softball could
change its dimensions. Have pitchers
throw from 50 feet instead of 43, and increase the length of the base paths
from 60 feet to 70. That in turn could
lead to pushing the fences back; if it doesn’t, then I’d consider making the
ball smaller. Smaller balls go farther
when hit, which then means a bigger field/stadium footprint.
Or maybe the NPF should
just throw in the towel and tell women it’s time to play baseball. Trust me, they have the talent to do it. Just ask my daughter.