Michigan
plays Florida starting tonight in a best-of-three contest to determine this
year’s NCAA D-I softball champs. With
Clare home over the weekend from Valpo, we watched a lot of softball.
The
two of us debate strategy and batting stances, but never the level of
talent. I raised a female athlete and
firmly believe women can—and will—play major league baseball. That’s my take; Clare’s is a little
different. She’s played with and now
coached enough girls to argue there isn’t the same level of interest in the
national pastime as we have in the Bukowski household. Many if not most softball players, my
daughter thinks, are perfectly happy keeping baseball at arm’s length. If so, I find that to be profoundly sad, like
the old argument that each sex has its separate sphere of expertise, which always
struck me as a clever way of saying “separate but equal.” On Friday, father and daughter shared the
couch watching softball. Occasionally,
Clare’s phone would go off with an update of the White Sox-Astros’ game.
I thought this kind
of thing happened in most softball families, but I may be wrong. I’d give anything to be wrong about being
wrong, and I’d give anything to have the best D-I softball team (MGOBLUE—they have
12 of 20 players from states where it snows) work out with a Chicago baseball
team, North Side or South. That might
change attitudes some.
No comments:
Post a Comment