The
fight for equal pay for equal work is easier than one involving equal pay for
comparable work. If A and B (or Man and
Woman) do the same job, they should get the same pay. But if the jobs are different, how exactly do
you compare?
That’s
a good part of the problem facing professional women’s sports and why I think
it’s a mistake to add more differences into the discussion (see Elena Delle
Donne and the lowered rim). Recently,
the argument over pay has focused on women’s tennis and now, with a formal
protest to the Equal Economic Opportunity Commission, soccer. Proponents for equal pay have television
ratings on their side, at least for soccer, and any tournament featuring Selena
Williams does pretty well, too. Opponents
can cite the difference in match length for tennis (best of three sets for
women, best of five for men), but there is no difference in time of game of
size of field in soccer. So, the
comparison is easier and tilts more towards equal for equal.
Of
course, everything would get turned upside down if a woman would ever break
into the ranks of an all-male sport.
Where have you gone, Branch Rickey, when a nation turns its lonely eyes
to you?
No comments:
Post a Comment