A
House Divided
We
had my in-laws over for Thanksgiving; they’re both what I’d call social Bears’
fans, like me. We don’t lose sleep over the
often dumb play that comes out of Soldier Field, but put us in a roomful of
people watching a game, and we’ll cheer right along. We also had their daughter and her family
over, Packers’ fans one and all (and five).
My in-laws also have a son who bleeds Cheesehead green and gold. So does Clare’s boyfriend, Chris. Now guess what two teams faced off against
one another in Green Bay last night and you have a Chicago version of civil war
right in the living room.
My
father-in-law’s youngest grandchild, a fearless 10-year old, walked through the
door and up to his grandfather, to let him know, “The Bears are going to lose
tonight.” Thank you very much. My brother-in-law no doubt was texting my
wife about how the Pack was going to dispose of the Bears by halftime, when
everyone at Lambeau Field could cheer their heads off for Brett Favre, who was
having his number retired, and Bart Starr, who was intent on showing that a
heart attack and stroke could not keep him from appearing. And still the Bears won, 17-13.
I
have no idea why so many football fans in these parts prefer the Packers to the
Bears. When I wax eloquent about the
departed Cardinals being the South Side NFL team, hardly a person knows what
I’m talking about, as the Cardinals checked out over 50 years ago. Both the Packers and Bears are known for hardnosed
football, with Green Bay having the better quarterbacks and Chicago the better
running backs. The Bears were pretty
good in the 1950s and the Packer even better in the 1960s; both teams pretty
much stunk in the ’70s while Chicago was always the more interesting team during
Da Age a Da Coach, 1981-1992. Favre came
to Green Bay in ’92, and the Packers have dominated ever since.
Still, none of this
explains why there are so many Packers’ fans south of the Wisconsin state
line. The best I can offer is that Vince
Lombardi had something to do with it. Deserved
or not, Lombardi had the reputation of being extremely tough but fair (and a
little brilliant) while George Halas was tough, arbitrary and cheap. I know that last quality really rubbed my blue-collar
father the wrong way. That, or Chicago-area
football fans reacted to the local team the same way I did with the White Sox—since
the Bears rarely had a good quarterback, it was more fun to watch the team of
Starr, Favre and (Aaron) Rodgers. Except
I never took the next step and switched over to the Braves or Red Sox.
No comments:
Post a Comment