Sports are different
in Chicago than other places. Joel
Quenneville fired is more popular than whoever coaches the Rangers. If Matt Nagy guides the Bears to the
postseason in his rookie season, he will have more clout than any three Jets’
and Giants’ coaches combined. If you
have to ask what clout is, then you’re not from around these parts.
I get a sense other
cities are one- or two-team towns—Cardinals; Yankees and Knicks; Steelers and
Penguins; It’s as if fans have only so much room in their hearts for a team or
two. But here it’s as if each franchise helps
define a part of the civic fabric. Our
blue-collar identity is reflected in the Bears, Blackhawks and White Sox, our
white-curtain sensibilities and insecurities (again, if you have to ask…) in
the Cubs. The Bulls remain however
Michael Jordan defined them, and Jordan was a demigod on a par with Ted
Williams.
If you have
South Side roots like I do, you live and die with the Sox and feel a vague
yearning for the Arizona ne St. Louis ne Chicago Cardinals, who once upon a
time played at Comiskey Park. Baseball
here does not produce “Chicago fans” but partisans of the North and South Side
versions of the game. The other sports
lend themselves more to a citywide following.
Maybe we take
sports so seriously because of our “Second City” complex. Everything, it seems, comes so easily to New
York; the only things that come with ease here are the cold and the gray (if
you have to wonder…). Sports, then, are our
fire, a way to generate heat and light in an otherwise dark and hostile
world. We don’t expect success so much
as we do full-out effort. When the one
leads to the other, we give thanks and elevate all those responsible to hero
status: Ditka, Guillen, Maddon, Quenneville and maybe Phil Jackson, if only he
bothered to visit.
Maybe I should
say we’re a Jack London kind of town, where the striving counts more than the
having. That said, I’m all in favor of
having the proverbial cake and eating it, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment