Where I grew up in
Chicago, we had plenty of corner groceries, including Carl’s; my mother sent me
there for milk and the Polish sausage.
Rumor had it other people went to place bets with Carl’s partner, Mickey,
who was said to make book in the back of the store. Suffice it to say that from early on in life I’ve
associated gambling with various other activities best hidden from view.
So, Monday’s Supreme
Court ruling that struck down a federal law restricting state involvement in
sports’ betting will in essence put gambling front and center (not far from
where Carl stacked the smoked fish next to the cash register). I’m curious as to how states will insure
against underage gamblers. At Carl’s,
you could shoot dice for the Hostess Twinkees.
I also wonder if what
promises to be a “golden age” of state-sanctioned gambling will lead
Commissioner Rob Manfred to reconsider the ban on Pete Rose and the Black
Sox. You could argue these were players
ahead of their times. If not, MLB will
have to come up with rationale why, and something better than to say that was
then and this is now. Personally, I
can’t wait.
No comments:
Post a Comment