Yesterday, I found myself playing
the 1949 White Sox against the ’49 Pirates, two sixth-place teams locked in a
Strat-O-Matic series. The good guys, the
American League, won in six.
I had 42-year old Luke Appling and
his 121 walks batting third. Let me
repeat, 121 walks, and let me add, 24 (!!!) strikeouts in 619 plate
appearances. In a twenty-year career
that began in 1930, Appling walked 1302 times while striking out 528
times. By way of comparison, Yoan
Moncada of the Sox has fanned 303 times in not even two full seasons.
Apples and oranges, past to
present, never the two shall meet? You
can’t compare a Hall of Famer to a 23-year old work in progress? Well, how about Eddie Joost, then? He’s not in Cooperstown, in part because he
was a career .239 hitter. But guess
what? Joost walked 149 times in 1949,
and he had a career .361 OBP over a seventeen seasons.
Or what about Eddie Yost, aptly nicknamed
“The Walking Man”? Yost only walked 91
times in 1949, but, hey, he was just 22.
The next season he managed141 free passes, and that wasn’t even a career
best. In 1956, Yost walked 151 times
with the Senators. In an eighteen-year
career, Yost batted .254 while amassing a 394 OBP. Twenty years, seventeen years, eighteen years—notice
a pattern?
Ted Williams hit 43 homeruns (with
162 walks!) and Vern Stephens, his Red Sox teammate, chipped in with 39 long
balls, so it’s not like we’re talking Dead Ball Era II here. The whole approach to hitting was different,
and in this case, superior to what it is today.
If there were more Eddie Joosts and Eddie Yosts around, let alone Luke
Applings, you’d have a heck of a lot more scoring.
And people would realize baseball is
about more than launch angles and exit velocity.
No comments:
Post a Comment